Supply values for the following parameters

#Supply values for the following parameters manual#
#Supply values for the following parameters archive#
#Supply values for the following parameters Patch#
#Supply values for the following parameters code#

SpecifyВ the '-Verbose' flag to view theВ SQLВ statementsВ beingВ applied to theВ target database.

UsingВ NuGetВ project 'CodeFirstMigration'.

UsingВ StartUpВ project 'CodeFirstMigration'.

#Supply values for the following parameters code#

TheВ DesignerВ Code for thisВ migrationВ fileВ includesВ aВ snapshot of your current Code First model.В ThisВ snapshot is used to calculateВ theВ changes to yourВ model when youВ scaffoldВ the next migration.В IfВ youВ makeВ additionalВ changes to yourВ modelВ thatВ youВ want to include in thisВ migration, then youВ canВ re-scaffoldВ it by running 'Add-MigrationВ UserContextss' again.ScaffoldingВ migration 'UserContextss'.Supply values for theВ followingВ parameters:.cmdlet Add -Migration at commandВ pipelineВ positionВ 1.Code First MigrationsВ enabled for projectВ CodeFirstMigration.CheckingВ ifВ theВ contextВ targetsВ anВ existing database.If I would buy a product with that kind of flaws, I would not keep buying it. Things like this are telling me that instead of creating a one-step solution, I will, every now and then, spend hours of figuring out how Azure really works reading blogs about undocumented (even when advertised as very useful) behaviors. If I am to go around fixing things like this one, then it is all the same if I create an ad-hoc solution myself as It will have the same number of problems. I am not even worried that this particular problem exists, I am worried about the mentality that does not see how problems like this one diverge from the advertised generality of Azure. But this flaw is a classical operational task of fixing a script for. Azure is supposed to give a developer the power to deploy effortlessly.

#Supply values for the following parameters Patch#

You read and find that 'it is as it is' and that you have to patch it yourself. You export a template and when you try to run it, it gives you 'something is bad'. 'Request_Source': ''Д®verywhere it says Name-Test has been changed from Name Then I adapted the JSON templet but left the 'name' in the resouces: First I changed it in the JSON Parameter file: So, please let name be used, perhaps with a -pleaseUseTheNameInTheParameterFileEvenThoughThisCmdletHasItsOwnNameParameterBecauseImNotConfused thought my message made it pretty clear that I understand that 'name' needs to be renamed, the questions is where? I don't know what a ARM template is.

#Supply values for the following parameters manual#

I don't want to have to tell clients that the easy tool has a bunch of manual editing steps to fix the problems it creates.

#Supply values for the following parameters archive#

There is no -force to accept it, unfortunately.Д®diting files produced by MS to be consumed by the MS script provided in the same archive is not desirable. If you try to use PS to suck in the parameter file with convertfrom-json so that you remove the param, the command fails because the schema does not mark 'name' as valid. If you try to export a resource by filling in the values in the gui and clicking on Automation Options, it just uses the 'name' fieldname for the parameter, thereby rendering the automation broken. If you export a template/parameter set from a created resource, the 'name' fieldname is extended to match the resource in the template and the corresponding parameters file. I'm suffering from this when I export templates from Azure. Hopefully the resolution to this issue involves allowing passing a parameter named name through the -TemplateParameterObject

+ CategoryInfo : CloseError: (:), InvalidOperationException New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment : The deployment validation failed. + FullyQualifiedErrorId : .NewAzureResourceGroupDeploymentCommand + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:), Exception + New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment -ResourceGroupName test-group -Tem. The only supported parameters for this template are 'name'. Not valid they are not present in the original template and can therefore not be provided atДeployment time. Template validation failed: 'The template parameters 'nameFromTemplate' in the parameters file are New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment : 4:23:48 PM - Error: Code=InvalidTemplate Message=Deployment WARNING: The output object type of this cmdlet will be modified in a future release.